|
|
| Friday, May 20, 2005 01:00 PM |
| Thank You, Sarcasmo |
 by Fëanor |
I have nothing original to say to you today (maybe after I've caught up on my sleep a bit more I'll come up with something), so for now, enjoy some links recycled from my favorite Corner of the internet:
First, in honor of the recent release of a certain film, some Star Wars parody pictures from Worth1000.
And this game, though completely unrelated to Star Wars in any way, is pretty fun. You beat people for their money!
Oh, wait, I do have something original. I wanted to ask everyone a question. As you've probably all heard me say at least once or twice before, as soon as Revenge of the Sith comes out on DVD I'm planning on inviting everyone over to our place to watch ALL SIX Star Wars movies. That's right, both trilogies, in a row. I might even throw in the "Clone Wars" cartoons, just for good measure. It'll be an all day affair that will start early and end late, and I suspect some Star Wars-related foods will be prepared and consumed.
Anyway, my question is this: what order do you think the films should be shown in--I, II, III, IV, V, VI, or IV, V, VI, I, II, III? Me, I'm leaning toward the former, numerical ordering, because it will get the worst films out of the way first; it follows the internal chronology of the films; and it'll end on the high note of Anakin's redemption instead of the low note of Anakin's fall. But I can see how the the latter, original release ordering would be interesting, too. What do you folks think? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
